Finally, a breath of fresh air mixed with some common sense!
Thanks Rob.
Some of us are still waiting to see the peer reviewed studies that
refute Bruce_Low and Smiths contention that peer-reviewed studies do
not support explosive exercises as being more effective than
traditional slow and heavy weight training for enhancement of power
and athletic performance.
I'm especially interested because I've worked both sides of the
street, finding no difference in performance from my athletes when
the explosive routines were eliminated.
After using Olympic lifts from 1967 to 2003, I can attest to the
difficulty of removing some of these iconic lifts!
Barry Ross
Los Angeles, USA
John Casler writes:
Hi Barry,
You might want to re-read the "contentions" again. The bias and conclusions
of that paper are beyond questionable.
They are "not" supportive of "slow" training speeds for explosive and speed
sports.
You mention your experience with "athletes". What specific experience did
you find relevant? How did you conclude that using one over the other was
more successful?
What athletes and sports were these "case studies" in?
Regards,
John Casler
TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems
Century City, CA
http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
Sign all letters with full name & city of residence if you
wish them to be published!
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar